What Is Bio-Well, What It Measures, and Why We Use It for Environmental “Before/After” Case Studies

In our EMF-safe space case studies, you’ll see before-and-after environmental measurements taken in the same location—then repeated after an EMF-conditioner is installed.

This page gives you the full context:

• What Bio-Well is

• What it actually measures (and what it doesn’t)

• Why its data can be useful and credible for comparative, repeatable environmental documentation

• How we run measurements so the results are meaningful

The simplest way to understand Bio-Well

Bio-Well is a measurement system developed by Pr. Konstantin Korotkov, PhD. He refers to Bio-well technology as Electro-Photonic Imaging (EPI) or Gas Discharge Visualization (GDV). It captures a real physical phenomenon—an electrical discharge glow created under controlled conditions—then converts that optical/electrical signal into quantified parameters and visual reports. 

Bio-Well (the company) positions this as a way to measure “energy” and “biofield” patterns, and this page goes through the science. That interpretation is not always accepted in western medicine—but the underlying point still matters for your decision-making:

It is an instrument producing data that can be repeated, trended over time, and exported.

What Bio-Well measures vs. what it does not measure

What it can measure (objectively, as data)

• Electrical/optical discharge image features captured under a standardized pulse and imaging setup (GDV/EPI).

• Changes over time when you repeat measurements using the same protocol (trend and comparison use-case).

• With the Sputnik sensor (environment mode): changes in a circuit’s behavior influenced by the environment (the system describes this as capacitance changes between the antenna and environmental elements, producing time-dynamic graphs and “space parameters”). 

• Exportable datasets (including CSV) for analysis and documentation.

What it does not replace

• A standard EMF meter (RF power density, frequency analysis, magnetic field strength). Bio-Well is not designed to report EMF exposure in the same way an RF meter or gauss meter does.

• Building safety diagnostics (wiring faults, grounding verification, IAQ, mold, radon, etc.).

• Medical diagnosis. Bio-Well is widely used in wellness settings, but it is not a substitute for clinical testing or medical care.

How Bio-Well measures environments (the Sputnik sensor)

For homes, farms, offices, schools, clinics, and other large spaces, the key accessory is the Bio-Well Sputnik sensor.

Bio-Well’s own technical description says Sputnik connects into the camera system and forms resonance contours; the measured signal varies with the capacitance between the Sputnik antenna and environmental elements (ground, conductors, ambient factors). The company also states that geophysical parameters and artificial electromagnetic fields may influence that capacitance.

Why that matters in practice:

• The sensor can generate time-series graphs (not just a single snapshot).

• Measurements can run for long periods (Bio-Well notes days).

• Results can be saved and exported for documentation.

So for facility owners, practitioners, farmers, event managers, school principles or superintendents, and home owners, Sputnik’s value is comparative: track the same space before and after a change, using a consistent method.

Is Bio-Well Credible?

There are two different claims people mix together:

1. Is Bio-Well a real instrument producing repeatable measurements?

2. Do all interpretations of those measurements prove a specific biological or EMF claim?

The best, objective framing is:

1) It has a defined method and a long research arc around GDV/EPI

GDV/EPI has been discussed in peer-reviewed literature, including systematic review work on scope and applications. (PubMed)
There are also peer-reviewed papers describing GDV as a biometric imaging/modeling approach and discussing its potential to detect deviations from baseline states (again: interpretation varies by context). (PMC)

2) Bio-Well's scale of use and publication volume

Bio-Well states: 30 years of research, 400+ published studies, and 5,000+ practitioners worldwide. 
They matter as signals of adoption and the size of the ecosystem around the tool.

3) Bio-Well is used in university and research settings

Bio-Well’s science page states that research includes work from Saint Petersburg State University and mentions validation at UCLA’s Center for Health Sciences and the University of Arizona’s laboratory work in consciousness/health.

How we use Bio-Well in our EMF-safe spaces' case studies

We do not present Bio-Well as an “EMF meter.” We use it as a comparative environmental measurement system to document whether a space becomes more stable/changed over time after a Geofield Conditioner is installed—using the same testing procedures before and after. We're leveraging Bio-well's own algorithms and statistical models to analyze the data collected by the Bio-well device.

Our standard approach:

1. Baseline window
   We take multiple measurements to establish what “normal variability” looks like in that space (time of day, occupancy, major electrical loads, weather shifts).

2. Installation
   We install the conditioning system in the space.

3. Follow-up window
   We repeat measurements using the same placement, same height, same location, and compare the time-series and parameters.

4. Interpretation
   We analyze Bio-well's analytics to interpret the “measured environmental parameter changes under a consistent method,” and then connect them to what matters for decision-makers: comfort, recovery, sleep quality, learning environments, clinic calm, performance, production, focus, stress management, workplace resilience, etc.

Bio-Well describes Sputnik as producing space parameters, time-dynamic graphs, and exportable CSV data—this is exactly what supports this comparative use-case.

What makes Bio-Well results stronger (and what weakens them)

Stronger measurements come from:

• Multiple baseline readings (not one).

• Consistent Sputnik placement and height.

• Logging conditions (occupancy, HVAC state, major loads, doors/windows, weather).

• Comparing changes against normal variability.

• When possible: pairing with standard EMF readings (RF + magnetic fields) for a fuller picture.

Results can be weakened by:

• Moving the sensor between tests.

• Big humidity/grounding changes without logging them.
  

Who this matters for

If you manage a large space—hotels, resorts, schools, universities, clinics, hospitals, offices, gyms, farms, ranches, and retreat centers—the core operational question is simple:

Can we document an improvement in the energy “quality” of a space in a way that is repeatable and auditable?

Bio-Well environment mode (Sputnik) is one tool we use to help answer that question with structured before/after measurement—without relying on testimonials alone.

Important disclaimer

Bio-Well environment scans are not medical diagnosis and not a substitute for standard EMF instrumentation. We use Bio-Well to document comparative environmental changes over time using consistent protocols, and we communicate results transparently without claiming it measures RF exposure directly.