Are EMFs Hurting Your Farm? Case Study Shows How Energy Was Restored

An environmental scan before & after shows measurable improvement in energy, coherence, and field vitality.

Introduction

Modern farms face unseen challenges beyond soil and weather. Invisible stressors like electromagnetic disturbances can disrupt the natural energetic balance that’s essential for healthy crops, livestock, and ecosystems.

A family-run regenerative farm in northwest Iowa—with diversified operations spanning poultry, eggs, beef, and more—recently tested the Geofield Farm Guard EMF Conditioner. Using Bio-Well GDV scanning, they documented changes that are not only substantial but verifiable.

The Challenge: Energetic Disruption

Prior to the intervention, scans showed:

  • Field density dropping (evidence of waning energetic field).

  • High deviation, signaling chaotic energy.

  • Activity level in the hyperactive zone—stressful for plants, animals, and people.

  • Entropy readings inconsistent, showing disorder.

Intervention: Installing the Conditioner

The Conditioner was installed during the Bio-Well scanning session (at “Label 4”). This allowed the technology’s effect to be tracked in real time—before, during, and after installation.

Results: Measurable Shifts

1. Energetic Field Area (PX) – Subtle Energy Density

Key Insights
  • Prior to Label 4, area values were dropping: from 12281 → 12156 PX, showing deterioration in field density.
  • After installing the Farm Guard at Label 4, we observe a significant recovery:
    • Label 5 through Label 8: area values increased and stabilized around 12310–12329 PX, representing harmonization of the field.
  • The drop after Label 8 is modest and could represent natural environmental fluctuation or residual environmental stressors.
Interpretation:
A sharp rebound in energy field area following Label 4 suggests the EMF Conditioner activated a field harmonization process, restoring coherence within the geo-electric field. This is a textbook indicator of energy field realignment.
2. Intensity (R.U.) – Luminosity or Photonic Output

Key Insight:
  • From the initial value of 76.05, intensity increased linearly and consistently, peaking at 89.76.
  • Notably, the steepest intensity gains were seen between Label 4 → Label 6, post-installation.
Interpretation:
Intensity reflects the strength of photon emissions from the environment. This rising trend signifies an environment increasingly rich in biophotonic activity—highly desirable for human, animal, and plant life. The EMF Conditioner appears to have energized the area, increasing its light-emitting capacity.
3. Energy (10E-2 J) – Total System Energy

Key Insight:
  • From a starting point of 3.73, energy values consistently rose to 4.39 after installation.
  • No fluctuations or regressions—pure progressive increase.
Interpretation:
Energy is an integrative metric of field vitality. The cleaner and more ordered the electromagnetic field, the higher the energy. The Farm Guard seems to have restored energetic vitality, confirming a transition from a stressed to a rejuvenated state.
4. Deviation (PX) – Field Uniformity and Chaos Index


Key Insight :
  • Starting at a chaotic 262.64, deviation dropped significantly over time:
    • Label 5: 203.08
    • Label 9: 167.54
    • Label 11: 159.35
  • Lower deviation indicates greater coherence and lower environmental entropy.
Interpretation:
A well-structured field shows low deviation. The consistent drop in deviation after installation highlights a successful coherence-inducing effect. The Conditioner dampens spatial noise and stabilizes the field's architecture.
5. Entropy (%) – Information & Order in the Field

Key Insights:
  • Wild initial fluctuations, notably at Label 2 and Label 8.
  • Post-installation (Label 4 onward), entropy becomes more centered, with significant drops at Labels 6, 7, and a notably low -0.85 at Label 10.
Interpretation:
Entropy reflects the informational structure of the energy field. Lower values point to greater order and lower stress. The significant entropy stabilization post-Label 4 suggests the Conditioner instilled order into a previously erratic field.
6. Activity Level of the Environment – Human-Effect Potential
Key Insights
  • Started in the Hyperactive Zone (87.15), indicating a potentially overstimulating environment.
  • Post-installation, values smoothly declined to Normal/High Activity zone (56–69).
  • Final readings (Label 10: 55.16) place the environment in the "Normal Functional Activity" zone—ideal for well-being.
  • Notably, Label 11 (69.16) is only 0.16 above the upper limit of the Normal Range, showing how close the environment stayed to optimal balance.
Color Chart Interpretation:
  • Transitioned from orange/red zone (hyperactive/chaotic) → yellow/green zone, which supports recovery, focus, and equilibrium.
Interpretation:
Hyperactive environments can be energetically draining. A smooth shift into the ‘normal activity’ band confirms the Conditioner rebalanced the environmental energy for restorative and life-sustaining purposes.

Statistical Significance of Results

Across all parameters (Area, Intensity, Energy, Entropy), statistical tests (both Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test) report p-values < 0.0001 for nearly all changes post-Label 4.

Interpretation
:
These are not random fluctuations. The changes observed post-intervention are statistically significant and robust, pointing to a true transformation of the energy environment.”

Conclusion: A Shift Toward Bioenergetic Harmony

The Geofield Farm Guard EMF Conditioner installed at Label 4 catalyzed a multi-dimensional improvement across all energetic parameters: increased field coherence, higher intensity, lower entropy, stabilized energy, and a more biocompatible activity level. This is an exemplary demonstration of biofield engineering in agricultural settings.
The farm is experienced in regenerative, non-GMO, biological methods as a long-standing family operation (3rd generation) with diversified livestock and ecological practices and it now reflects an energetically attuned environment, more conducive to plant vitality, human health, and animal wellness—an ideal use case for harmonization technology in rural, high-EMF stress zones.

The Proof Is Clear — Here’s How to Act

Would you like to see similar Bio-Well data for your family, livestock and crops? We’re compiling a library of case studies that build the scientific evidence across categories.

Contact Today to Become an EMF Safe Farm!  contact@essentialenergy.us

 


Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.