The Case

Dr. Marlene Siegel (integrative veterinarian) captured live blood analysis images for Lychi (cat) before and ~45 minutes after using a 4” Light Tower (Essential Pro). In the post image, red blood cells appear more separated (less stacked/clumped) with improved overall morphology, consistent with Dr. Siegel’s narration that “a lot of cells separated” and the cat “started feeling better.”

• Subject: Lychi (cat)

• Practitioner: Dr. Marlene Siegel (integrative veterinarian)

• Device used: 4” Light Tower / Essential Pro (targeted session)

• Session setup: Tower placed under the cat’s enclosure/carrier (as described)

• Timing: Follow-up blood image captured ~45 minutes post-session

• Observed result: More separation + improved cell morphology in the post image

What is Live Blood Analysis (& Why We Use It In These Cases)?

Live blood analysis examines a fresh drop of blood under a microscope to observe patterns—especially how red blood cells appear to separate, maintain structure, and behave as a “flow system.”

It is not a standalone medical diagnosis. Its value here is as a before/after trend tool—when you document a baseline, introduce one variable, and then observe whether a meaningful pattern shift occurs.

What The Images Show (Before vs. After)

Pre-session (baseline)

In Lychi’s pre-treatment image, many red blood cells appear more stacked/clumped (rouleaux-like grouping) across the field.

Why that matters: red blood cells function best when they stay flexible and can move freely through the tiniest vessels. When cells stack or aggregate, micro-level flow can become less efficient.

Post-session (~45 minutes after 4” Light Tower)

In the post-treatment image, many cells appear more separated with improved overall morphology (more “distinct individual cells” across the field). Dr. Siegel’s narration reflects the same observation: “a lot of cells separated… much better morphology.”

Credible Research: Non-Ionizing EMFs (and Light) Can Shift Red Blood Cell Behavior

These case studies sit inside a real scientific question: can non-ionizing exposures—RF (Wi-Fi/cellular), ELF fields, and even specific light wavelengths—change how red blood cells behave (shape/structure, membrane properties, aggregation tendencies, and blood-related parameters)?

Peer-reviewed studies have explored this from multiple angles:

• Short-term 5G-range RF exposure altered red blood cell morphometry (in vitro human blood).
  A 2025 in-vitro study reported that 5G RF-EMR exposure significantly altered erythrocyte morphometry, with notable effects by frequency (including 700 MHz).
  
  

• High-frequency EMF exposure changed red blood cell behavior in controlled lab conditions
  A 2017 Scientific Reports paper found that exposing RBCs to an 18 GHz EMF could induce measurable changes in cell interactions (reported as nanosphere uptake in RBCs).
  
  

• Extremely low frequency magnetic fields can modify red blood cell responses under oxidative stress
  A PubMed-indexed study examined 50 Hz magnetic fields and reported effects on rabbit RBCs when combined with an oxidative challenge—relevant because RBC membrane integrity and oxidative load are key drivers of aggregation/structure changes. (PubMed)
  
  

• Light exposure can measurably change RBC rheology
  A 2022 study on photobiomodulation reported that certain 450-nm irradiation conditions affected RBC deformability and aggregation/disaggregation behavior, showing that light inputs can alter blood flow properties. (ScienceDirect)
  
  

Conclusion:

Even when radiation is “non-ionizing,” it can still interact with biology in measurable ways—especially systems that are electrically active and membrane-dependent, like red blood cells. That’s why a before/after live blood analysis format is a reasonable way to document whether a targeted intervention correlates with a real-time shift in blood patterns.

Why More "Stacked/Clumped” Blood Can Matter for EMF Resilience

When blood behaves “thicker” at the micro level (often associated with aggregation), tissues may not get delivery as efficiently—especially in tiny vessels. In clinical hyperviscosity/microvascular stasis states, symptoms can include things like fatigue and neurologic complaints because microcirculation is compromised. (NCBI)

For pets, you’re not trying to label diseases from a slide. You’re looking at whether physiology appears to shift toward a more efficient, free-flowing pattern—because that’s essential for resilience.

Why This Case Matters (& What It Suggests)

Dr. Siegel described Lychi as being extremely unwell (“to the eleventh and a half hour”), and after the 4” Light Tower session she observed:

• a visible improvement in blood pattern (more separation / improved morphology)

• and reported the cat “started feeling better.”

This is not presented as a cure claim. It’s presented as what it is:

A documented before/after observation showing a fast physiological shift in a veterinary setting after a defined intervention.

4” vs 7”: Why Time-To-Change Can Differ

Dr. Siegel’s narration makes an important practical point: device strength can affect how quickly you see a shift. In later cases using larger towers, changes were seen faster—while the 4” tower still produced a measurable-looking shift here, but over a longer window (~45 minutes).

If you want to visualize it: it’s not only “how much,” it’s also “how fast.”

How the Light Tower is Used (Directional) — & The Home/Clinic-Coverage Option

The LightTowers are typically used directionally in sessions (as in this case, placed under/near the animal and applied for a defined time).

Large Area Coverage (with Scalar Home Stand):

If you want ambient, continuous coverage, LightTowers can be paired with a Scalar Home Stand:

• 4” Light Tower (Essential Pro)+ Scalar Home Stand: ~800 sq. ft. (fits many apartments)

• 5" LightTower (Essential Elite)+ Scalar Home Stand: approximately 1.5 acres
  

• 7” Light Tower (Essential Max) + Scalar Home Stand: up to ~3.5 acres (larger homes/hospitals etc.)
  

Next Steps

If you’ve noticed your pet feels “off” in modern life—less settled, less resilient, or not quite at their best—this case is one example of how improving the electromagnetic quality of their environment may support healthier regulation and recovery.

In today’s wireless, artificial-light world, energy and EMF stress doesn’t just affect humans. It impacts all living systems—people, pets, plants, and the microbial ecosystems that sustain life. That’s why we focus on measurable proof and real-world results, backed by our 30 and 90-day money-back guarantees, so you can evaluate the difference in your own space.

Shop Now

Learn more: Live Blood Analysis & EMF-Related Blood Topics

• Popcorn the Service Dog: Calmer, More Free-Flowing Blood Patterns After 10 Minutes With Essential Max
  A live blood analysis case showing how a short Essential Max session corresponded with healthier red blood cell behavior in a working service dog.
  Link: (add once published)
  
  

• Live Blood Analysis Case Study (Dr. Michael B.*): Reduced Red Blood Cell Clumping After Just 72 Hours!
  A home case documenting a before/after live blood microscopy shift ~72 hours after installing the GeoField XT EMF Conditioner, with research context on EMF effects on blood.
  Link: (paste the Dr. Michael B. case study URL here once it’s published)
  
  

• Improve The 4th Phase of Water In Blood
  A live-blood-focused post exploring blood patterns, oxygen delivery concepts, and the “structured water” framework discussed in the Essential Energy community.

Disclaimer: Educational purposes only. Not veterinary or medical advice. Not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Individual results vary.