Why Dr. Beverly Rubik Studied Essential Energy

When evaluating technologies that claim to influence the human biofield, credibility matters.

That’s why Essential Energy points to the independent work of Dr. Beverly Rubik, Ph.D.—a biophysicist internationally recognized for her research into the biofield, electromagnetic fields, and energy-based measurement systems.

Rather than relying on testimonials or theory alone, Dr. Rubik chose to measure what happens when Essential Energy technology is introduced under controlled conditions against a sham look-alike product.



Who Is Dr. Beverly Rubik?

Dr. Beverly Rubik, Ph.D., is a scientist and scholar internationally renowned for her pioneering work in frontier science and medicine beyond the mainstream biochemical model.

Her credentials include:

  • Ph.D. in Biophysics, University of California, Berkeley

  • Founder and Director, Institute for Frontier Science (since 1996)

  • Former Director, Temple University’s Center for Frontier Sciences

  • Former member, NIH Office of Alternative Medicine Advisory Board

  • Author of over 90 peer-reviewed papers

  • Editorial board member for multiple scientific journals

  • International speaker on EMFs, biofields, and consciousness in biology

Dr. Rubik is known for applying measurement tools to phenomena often discussed but rarely quantified.

That background is precisely why her involvement matters.


Why This Study Was Conducted

In early 2020, Dr. Rubik conducted an independent exploratory study to evaluate whether Essential Energy technology produced measurable changes when subjects were exposed to artificial electromagnetic fields.

The goal was not to diagnose disease, treat conditions, or make medical claims.

The goal was simple:

Can measurable biofield parameters change when Essential Energy devices are introduced under EMF stress conditions?


Study Design

  • Measurement tool: Bio-Well 2.0 device

  • Design: Single-blinded (subjects unaware of active vs. sham device)

  • Exposure: Artificial EMF from cell phones, cordless phones, and Wi-Fi

  • Intervention: Essential Energy PRO (4” LightTower)

  • Duration: 20 minutes per condition

  • Comparison: Active device vs. sham device on separate days

Bio-Well technology assesses parameters commonly described as:

  • Stress indicators

  • Energy levels

  • Left–right balance

  • Overall coherence patterns


What Was Observed

Using Bio-Well measurements, the study observed clear before–after differences when subjects were exposed to EMF stress and then measured with the active Essential Energy device compared to the sham.

Key observations included:

  • Improved energy readings

  • Improved left–right balance

  • Reduced stress indicators

  • Greater overall coherence compared to sham exposure

These changes were measured, not inferred.

Dr. Rubik summarized the findings as follows:

“When subjects were exposed to an increased level of microwave radiation from wireless communication devices, the LightTower strengthened the biofield, increasing energy and left-right balance, as seen with Bio-Well testing.”


What This Means

This study:

  • ✅ Demonstrates measurable biofield changes

  • ✅ Uses established electrophotonic measurement tools

  • ✅ Compares active vs. sham devices

  • ✅ Was conducted independently

It provides objective measurement—something rare in this space.


Why Essential Energy Highlights This Research

Most EMF-related products rely on:

  • Blocking claims

  • Shielding language

  • Fear-based marketing

Essential Energy takes a different approach.

Instead of claiming to eliminate EMFs, the technology is designed to support harmony and balance in the presence of unavoidable exposure.

Dr. Rubik’s study is highlighted because it aligns with that philosophy:

  • Measure first

  • Observe honestly

  • Let people decide


Products Used in the Study

The study evaluated Essential Energy’s L.I.F.E technology, present in all Essential Energy Plates. 

Larger versions of this technology (ELITE and MAX) expand surface area and speed up impact, but the Flow Pendant and PRO were used intentionally to evaluate effects using the smallest devices.


Why This Page Exists

People want more than opinions.
They want measurement.

This page exists so you can see how Essential Energy has been evaluated, who conducted the evaluation, and what was observed—without hype, exaggeration, or medical claims.

From there, the decision is yours.

 

 Shop Now  

 


Disclaimer

This research was conducted as an independent exploratory study using Bio-Well measurements. It was not a clinical trial, and Essential Energy products are not medical devices.

Individual experiences may vary.


Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.